<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Wants You to Fail Your Adwords Exam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ppclab.com/2007/07/google-wants-you-to-fail-your-adwords-exam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ppclab.com/2007/07/google-wants-you-to-fail-your-adwords-exam/</link>
	<description>The real deal on paid search and PPC advertising</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.ppclab.com/2007/07/google-wants-you-to-fail-your-adwords-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 04:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppclab.com/?p=85#comment-213</guid>
		<description>* Edit (delete previous) Even, your images are broken. The screen shoots you took of the exam are not showing. Maybe you dont see it because your browser&#039;s cache. Hope you fix it, and thanks for your courage to exposed Google chat exams. I dont think they should re-charge if you dont pass the online exam. I took CISCO CNNA exam, and you have multiple chances to pass it (without having to pay again).
Google was like open source--free info. Now they got greedy and total jerks. This is why facebook made a partnership with Microsoft and not with them. Google does not play fair anymore. Trick questions? what is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* Edit (delete previous) Even, your images are broken. The screen shoots you took of the exam are not showing. Maybe you dont see it because your browser&#8217;s cache. Hope you fix it, and thanks for your courage to exposed Google chat exams. I dont think they should re-charge if you dont pass the online exam. I took CISCO CNNA exam, and you have multiple chances to pass it (without having to pay again).<br />
Google was like open source&#8211;free info. Now they got greedy and total jerks. This is why facebook made a partnership with Microsoft and not with them. Google does not play fair anymore. Trick questions? what is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.ppclab.com/2007/07/google-wants-you-to-fail-your-adwords-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 04:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppclab.com/?p=85#comment-211</guid>
		<description>DO NOT LISTEN TO Courtenay Provert. This iPassExam is a lie. You go to his site, and they promised to show you a demo if you register. Once you register you get nothing!!! But a message asking you to pay for it. Waste of time. The fact that they were dishonest in their FREE DEMO claim, i wouldn&#039;t try  their product at all. Cheaters.

What you get if you register to see the demo an email from them, and this message.

Due to the different nature of moneybooker transactions we cannot provide instant access to the questions but do try to activate accounts within 24 hours of receiving payment.
To pay with moneybookers send a payment to support@ipassexam.com, then send us an email with the following information:
your iPassExam account username (the email address you used to register)
what resource(s) you want access to</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DO NOT LISTEN TO Courtenay Provert. This iPassExam is a lie. You go to his site, and they promised to show you a demo if you register. Once you register you get nothing!!! But a message asking you to pay for it. Waste of time. The fact that they were dishonest in their FREE DEMO claim, i wouldn&#8217;t try  their product at all. Cheaters.</p>
<p>What you get if you register to see the demo an email from them, and this message.</p>
<p>Due to the different nature of moneybooker transactions we cannot provide instant access to the questions but do try to activate accounts within 24 hours of receiving payment.<br />
To pay with moneybookers send a payment to <a href="mailto:support@ipassexam.com">support@ipassexam.com</a>, then send us an email with the following information:<br />
your iPassExam account username (the email address you used to register)<br />
what resource(s) you want access to</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Courtenay Probert</title>
		<link>http://www.ppclab.com/2007/07/google-wants-you-to-fail-your-adwords-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Courtenay Probert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 11:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppclab.com/?p=85#comment-195</guid>
		<description>The quality of the questions has been an ongoing complaint for the GAP exam.  Fortunately Google has cleaned its act up with the relaunch of the Adwords Profesional exam as Google Adwords Fundamentals exam.  Best practise for MCQ, &#039;best of four&#039; format is more closely adhered to.  No more questions with 2 options.  Also they have obviously made an effort to sort out the accuracy issues. 

Unfortunately the passmark has also changed to 85%!  Between these 2 factors the exam is now a more difficult qualification to obtain.  Perhaps good news for the industry but bad news for anyone hoping for a quick and easy way to bolster their CV.

If your sitting the exam and want to try some &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/80i9yu&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;free Google Adwors Fundamentals exam style questions&lt;/a&gt; there are question available of the net.  There are also commercial questions banks available like &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/58a15N&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;iPassExam&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quality of the questions has been an ongoing complaint for the GAP exam.  Fortunately Google has cleaned its act up with the relaunch of the Adwords Profesional exam as Google Adwords Fundamentals exam.  Best practise for MCQ, &#8216;best of four&#8217; format is more closely adhered to.  No more questions with 2 options.  Also they have obviously made an effort to sort out the accuracy issues. </p>
<p>Unfortunately the passmark has also changed to 85%!  Between these 2 factors the exam is now a more difficult qualification to obtain.  Perhaps good news for the industry but bad news for anyone hoping for a quick and easy way to bolster their CV.</p>
<p>If your sitting the exam and want to try some <a href="http://bit.ly/80i9yu" rel="nofollow">free Google Adwors Fundamentals exam style questions</a> there are question available of the net.  There are also commercial questions banks available like <a href="http://bit.ly/58a15N" rel="nofollow">iPassExam</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Courtenay Probert</title>
		<link>http://www.ppclab.com/2007/07/google-wants-you-to-fail-your-adwords-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Courtenay Probert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 11:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppclab.com/?p=85#comment-194</guid>
		<description>The quality of the questions has been an ongoing complaint for the GAP exam.  Fortunately Google has cleaned its act up with the relaunch of the Adwords Profesional exam as Google Adwords Fundamentals exam.  Best practise for MCQ, &#039;best of four&#039; format is more closely adhered to.  No more questions with 2 options.  Also they have obviously made an effort to sort out the accuracy issues. 

Unfortunately the passmark has also changed to 85%!  Between these 2 factors the exam is now a more difficult qualification to obtain.  Perhaps good news for the industry but bad news for anyone hoping for a quick and easy way to bolster their CV.

If your sitting the exam and want to try some &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/80i9yu&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;free Google Adwors Fundamentals exam style questions there are question available of the net.  There are also commercial questions banks available like &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/58a15N&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;iPassExam&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quality of the questions has been an ongoing complaint for the GAP exam.  Fortunately Google has cleaned its act up with the relaunch of the Adwords Profesional exam as Google Adwords Fundamentals exam.  Best practise for MCQ, &#8216;best of four&#8217; format is more closely adhered to.  No more questions with 2 options.  Also they have obviously made an effort to sort out the accuracy issues. </p>
<p>Unfortunately the passmark has also changed to 85%!  Between these 2 factors the exam is now a more difficult qualification to obtain.  Perhaps good news for the industry but bad news for anyone hoping for a quick and easy way to bolster their CV.</p>
<p>If your sitting the exam and want to try some <a href="http://bit.ly/80i9yu" rel="nofollow">free Google Adwors Fundamentals exam style questions there are question available of the net.  There are also commercial questions banks available like </a><a href="http://bit.ly/58a15N" rel="nofollow">iPassExam</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan PPCPROZ</title>
		<link>http://www.ppclab.com/2007/07/google-wants-you-to-fail-your-adwords-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan PPCPROZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 08:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppclab.com/?p=85#comment-137</guid>
		<description>I have not checked, but I would assume that sharing the exam questions would be against the TOS?

Also, you are complaining too much. The test is purposely difficult, i think, in order to fail unqualified people. You only need an 83% to pass, so they expect you to get many wrong.  I took the test twice... I thought I should be able to ace it, but I got only a 93%, so i think its good the way it is, except for outdated questions of coarse.  

In this example: What is a benefit of using broad matches with negative keywords, instead of exact match keywords by themselves?
A.Your ad will attract more traffic.
B.You don’t have to update the keyword list.
C.You can create keyword lists more quickly.
D.You can be certain which keyword the user searched.

A &amp; C seem correct here.

I would say only A

Also, each question clearly tells you whether you should chose the best answer, or all that apply, or choose 3, ect.  

Follow the instructions carefully, and don&#039;t expect to pass if you are just relying on open book to help you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not checked, but I would assume that sharing the exam questions would be against the TOS?</p>
<p>Also, you are complaining too much. The test is purposely difficult, i think, in order to fail unqualified people. You only need an 83% to pass, so they expect you to get many wrong.  I took the test twice&#8230; I thought I should be able to ace it, but I got only a 93%, so i think its good the way it is, except for outdated questions of coarse.  </p>
<p>In this example: What is a benefit of using broad matches with negative keywords, instead of exact match keywords by themselves?<br />
A.Your ad will attract more traffic.<br />
B.You don’t have to update the keyword list.<br />
C.You can create keyword lists more quickly.<br />
D.You can be certain which keyword the user searched.</p>
<p>A &amp; C seem correct here.</p>
<p>I would say only A</p>
<p>Also, each question clearly tells you whether you should chose the best answer, or all that apply, or choose 3, ect.  </p>
<p>Follow the instructions carefully, and don&#8217;t expect to pass if you are just relying on open book to help you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cincinnati Movers</title>
		<link>http://www.ppclab.com/2007/07/google-wants-you-to-fail-your-adwords-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Cincinnati Movers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppclab.com/?p=85#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this. I&#039;m about to take the exam and this was helpful to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this. I&#8217;m about to take the exam and this was helpful to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philis Youngis</title>
		<link>http://www.ppclab.com/2007/07/google-wants-you-to-fail-your-adwords-exam/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Philis Youngis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppclab.com/?p=85#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Just a friendly warning to anyone about to sit the exam. I&#039;m currently working for an online marketing company and before completing my probationary I had to pass this exam, I think the thing that shocked me was how little time you get, 1hr 30mins for 120 questions. I completed the exam with 20 seconds to spare!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a friendly warning to anyone about to sit the exam. I&#8217;m currently working for an online marketing company and before completing my probationary I had to pass this exam, I think the thing that shocked me was how little time you get, 1hr 30mins for 120 questions. I completed the exam with 20 seconds to spare!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
